|
And when Paul had gathered a bundle of sticks, and laid them on the
fire, there came a viper out of the heat, and fastened on his hand. And
when the barbarians saw the venomous beast hang on his hand, they said
among themselves, No doubt this man is a murderer, whom, though he hath
escaped the sea, yet vengeance suffereth not to live. And he shook off
the beast into the fire, and felt no harm. Howbeit they looked when he
should have swollen, or fallen down dead suddenly: but after they had
looked a great while, and saw no harm come to him, they changed their
minds, and said that he was a god. (Acts 28: 3-6)
What a cruel twist of fate this must have seemed. A man who surely was
blessed to have survived the shipwreck finds himself moments later being
bitten by a poisonous snake. For a barbarian, the reason is obvious.
He did something to deserve this. He must be a murderer.
Wrong! Paul survives the snakebite with no ill effects. Another
conclusion is drawn. He must be a God. Wrong again! Isn’t it funny
how the minds of barbarians worked?
I guess that we’d like to think of ourselves as being much more
enlightened now. However, even today, we are prone to ascribe
everything that we perceive as being bad or inconvenient to the Devil.
Just as easily the things that we see as good or beneficial are ascribed
to the intervention of God. This is an area in which we must be
careful. There is a fine line between giving glory to God, and claiming
to know exactly what He is doing, or for what purpose.
There was a time when a runaway slave found his way to Paul in Rome. He
happened to be the property of one of the brethren at Collosae. Paul
preached the gospel to this slave. The slave obeyed the gospel. Paul
sent the slave back to the brother with a letter explaining that he was
receiving back more than a slave, but a brother in Christ. Paul
speculated as to the intervention of God in this process and makes this
statement; “Perhaps the reason he was separated from you
for a little while was that you might have him back for good-- no longer
as a slave, but better than a slave, as a dear brother. He is very dear
to me but even dearer to you, both as a man and as a brother in the
Lord.” (Philemon 15-16 NIV) Bear in mind that Onesimus had traveled
1000 miles as the crow flies from Collosae to Rome. He then
coincidentally runs into the Apostle Paul, who is also by coincidence
personally acquainted with Philemon. And all Paul can say is
perhaps this was providence. Does this mean that Paul didn’t
thank God for the salvation of this soul? Of course he thanked God. He
was simply careful not to claim that God had caused something that he
might not have caused.
In one sense, God either causes something to happen, or allows it to
happen, whether good or bad. This is the nature of His almighty power.
To speculate, however, on whether or not He has intervened, whether or
not He had a reason or what His reason is, simply falls beyond our
understanding. To make claims in these areas is to speak for God where
He has not spoken. What shall we say then, that we shouldn’t thank God
when good happens? Absolutely not, we should give thanks in all
things. (Eph 5: 20) This includes giving thanks when bad things
happen. This doesn’t mean that I should thank Him for the bad that has
happened. But even when bad happens, God hasn’t changed. And my
relationship to Him hasn’t changed simply because something bad has
happened. If God hasn’t changed, and our relationship hasn’t changed,
we have reason to be thankful.
I guess in a nutshell what I’m trying to say is that we cause ourselves
a lot of grief by focusing on what has happened, why it has happened,
and if God is intervening. Things would be much better if we would
focus as strongly on maintaining, nurturing and cultivating our
relationship with our Father through prayer, study, and obedience.
After all, it’s our relationship to God that separates us from the
barbarians.
|